Skip to main content

How to Resolve Error "CS0247: Cannot use a negative size with stackalloc" in C#

The Compiler Error CS0247 is a logical validity error regarding memory allocation. The message reads: "Cannot use a negative size with stackalloc".

In C#, the stackalloc operator is used to allocate a block of memory on the execution stack (as opposed to the heap). This is typically used with Span<T> or in unsafe pointer contexts for high-performance scenarios. Since physical memory allocation represents a quantity of bytes, asking the computer to allocate a negative amount of memory is impossible. This error occurs when the compiler detects that the size argument provided to stackalloc is a constant negative number.

This guide explains the rules of stack allocation and how to ensure your size parameters are valid.

Understanding Stack Allocation​

The syntax for stack allocation is:

Span<Type> buffer = stackalloc Type[size];

or inside unsafe blocks:

Type* buffer = stackalloc Type[size];

The size represents the number of elements to allocate.

  • Valid: 0 (Allocates an empty block) or any positive integer.
  • Invalid: Any negative integer (e.g., -1, -100).

CS0247 specifically catches this issue when the size is known at compile-time (literals or constants).

Scenario 1: Negative Integer Literals​

The most direct cause is typing a negative number directly into the brackets. While this is rare in production code, it can happen during testing or refactoring.

Example of error​

using System;

public class MemoryHandler
{
    public void Allocate()
    {
        // ⛔️ Error CS0247: Cannot use a negative size with stackalloc.
        // A length of -5 is physically impossible.
        Span<int> numbers = stackalloc int[-5];
    }
}

Solution: Use a Positive Size​

Ensure the dimension is zero or greater.

using System;

public class MemoryHandler
{
    public void Allocate()
    {
        // ✅ Correct: Allocates space for 5 integers on the stack.
        Span<int> numbers = stackalloc int[5];
    }
}

Scenario 2: Constant Calculations​

If you use const variables to define the size, the compiler evaluates the math immediately. If the result of a constant expression (e.g., Buffer - Offset) results in a negative number, CS0247 is triggered.

Example of error​

public class BufferManager
{
    const int TotalSize = 10;
    const int HeaderSize = 20;

    public void Initialize()
    {
        // ⛔️ Error CS0247: The compiler calculates (10 - 20) = -10.
        // Since this is constant, the compiler knows immediately it will fail.
        Span<byte> data = stackalloc byte[TotalSize - HeaderSize];
    }
}

Solution: Correct the Logic​

Fix the constant values to ensure the result is non-negative.

public class BufferManager
{
    const int TotalSize = 30; // Increased size
    const int HeaderSize = 20;

    public void Initialize()
    {
        // ✅ Correct: (30 - 20) = 10. A valid positive size.
        Span<byte> data = stackalloc byte[TotalSize - HeaderSize];
    }
}

Runtime vs. Compile-Time (The Variable Trap)​

It is crucial to note that CS0247 only appears if the size is a Compile-Time Constant.

If you use a standard variable (not const), the compiler cannot know the value until the program runs. In that case, the code will compile successfully, but it will crash at runtime with a System.OverflowException.

Variable Example (Runtime Crash):

public void UnsafeAllocation(int size)
{
    // Compiles OK (No CS0247), because 'size' is dynamic.
    // BUT, if you call UnsafeAllocation(-1), it throws System.OverflowException.
    Span<int> block = stackalloc int[size]; 
}
warning

Always validate variables before using them in stackalloc to prevent runtime crashes.

if (size < 0) throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(size));
Span<int> block = stackalloc int[size];

Conclusion​

CS0247 is a compile-time safety check for memory allocation.

  1. Check Literals: Ensure you haven't typed [-1].
  2. Check Math: Review your const calculations to ensure Size - Offset doesn't result in a negative number.
  3. Check Logic: Remember that allocating 0 items is allowed, but anything less is mathematically invalid for array lengths.

Table of Contents